Measuring and maintaining organ perfusion in a patient with Takayasu's arteritis undergoing cardiac surgery.

Takayasu's arteritis is a rare vasculitis affecting the aorta and its branches. Disease progression can result in arterial stenosis and subsequent organ dysfunction. Estimating organ perfusion by measuring the peripheral blood pressure can be challenging because it may be altered by arterial stenosis. We report the case of a 61-year-old woman with Takayasu's arteritis with aortic and mitral regurgitation who presented for aortic valve replacement and mitral valvuloplasty. Peripheral arterial pressure was considered a less reliable surrogate for organ perfusion because the patient had diminished blood flow in both the lower and upper extremities. In addition to the bilateral radial arterial pressure, the blood pressure in the ascending aorta was monitored to estimate the patient's organ perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass. The initial target blood pressure was determined based on the pre-operative baseline and modified by measurement of the aortic pressure. Cerebral oximetry using near-infrared spectroscopy and mixed venous saturation was monitored to estimate oxygen supply-demand balance, which helped evaluate cerebral perfusion and determine the transfusion threshold. The entire procedure was uneventful, and no organ dysfunction was observed postoperatively.

Effect of skin antiseptic solutions on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The most effective skin antiseptic solution to reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) remains unknown. AIM: To compare solutions with different chlorhexidine (CHG)-based concentrations and povidone-iodine (PVI) in adults with a central venous catheter (CVC) or arterial catheter, and identify an association with the incidence of CRBSI. METHODS: This study evaluated randomized controlled trials comparing CHG and PVI antiseptic agents in patients aged ≥18 years with an underlying illness and a CVC or arterial catheter. The primary outcome was CRBSI rate. Network meta-analysis was performed by a frequentist-based approach with multi-variate random effects meta-analysis, and the effect size was expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). FINDINGS: The search yielded 1511 records, of which five studies (2815 catheters) were included in the network meta-analysis. The risk of CRBSI was significantly lower with 1% CHG-alcohol than with 0.5% CHG-alcohol (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.98; high certainty) or 10% PVI-aqueous (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.63; high certainty). There was no significant difference in the risk of CRBSI between 1% CHG-alcohol and 2% CHG-aqueous (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.04; moderate certainty) or other antiseptic solutions. The hierarchy of efficacy in reducing CRBSI was 1% CHG-alcohol, 0.5% CHG-alcohol, 2% CHG-aqueous and 10% PVI-aqueous. CONCLUSION: Antiseptic agents containing 1% CHG-alcohol were more strongly associated with reduced risk for CRBSI compared with agents containing 0.5% CHG-alcohol or 10% PVI-aqueous.

Stent as a bridge to surgery or immediate colectomy for malignant right colonic obstruction: propensity-scored, national database study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of urgent colectomy and placement of a self-expanding metallic stent followed by colectomy for patients with malignant right colonic obstruction. Right-sided malignant obstruction is less common than left-sided. Stenting for malignant left colonic obstruction has been reported to reduce postoperative complications. However, the impact of stenting for malignant right colonic obstruction remains undefined. METHODS: The study included patients with right-sided malignant obstruction or stenosis undergoing colectomy between April 2012 and March 2017 identified from a nationwide database. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare mortality and morbidity rates, proportion receiving a stoma and postoperative stay between urgent colectomy and stent groups. RESULTS: From 9572 patients, 1500 pairs were generated by propensity score matching. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the urgent colostomy and stent groups (1·6 versus 0·9 per cent respectively; P = 0·069). Complications were more common after urgent colectomy than stenting (22·1 versus 19·1 per cent; P = 0·042). Surgical-site infection was more likely with urgent colectomy (7·1 versus 4·4 per cent; P = 0·001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in anastomotic leakage (3·8 versus 2·6 per cent; P = 0·062). The proportion of patients needing a stoma was higher with urgent colectomy than primary treatment with stents (5·1 versus 1·7 per cent; P < 0·001). Postoperative stay was longer after urgent colectomy (15 versus 13 days; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Stenting followed by colectomy in patients with malignant right colonic obstruction may provide more favourable perioperative outcomes than urgent colectomy.

ANTECEDENTES: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados perioperatorios entre la colectomía urgente y la colocación de una endoprótesis (stent) metálica autoexpandible seguida de colectomía en pacientes con obstrucción maligna del colon derecho. La obstrucción maligna del colon derecho es menos frecuente que la del colon izquierdo. Se ha demostrado que la colocación de una endoprótesis en la obstrucción maligna del colon izquierdo reduce las complicaciones postoperatorias. Sin embargo, el impacto de la colocación de una endoprótesis en la obstrucción maligna del colon derecho no está definido. MÉTODOS: Los pacientes con obstrucción o estenosis maligna del colon derecho sometidos a colectomía desde abril de 2012 hasta marzo de 2017 se analizaron a partir de una base de datos nacional. Se realizó un análisis mediante emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión para comparar la mortalidad, la morbilidad, el porcentaje de pacientes en los que se realizó un estoma y la estancia postoperatoria entre los grupos de colectomía urgente y endoprótesis. RESULTADOS: A partir de 9.572 pacientes, se generaron 1.500 parejas mediante emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión. No hubo diferencias significativas en la mortalidad hospitalaria entre los dos grupos (1,6% versus 0,9%, P = 0,07). Las complicaciones fueron más frecuentes después de la colectomía urgente en comparación con las endoprótesis (22,1% versus 19,1%, P = 0,04). La infección del sitio quirúrgico ocurrió con mayor frecuencia en el grupo de la colectomía urgente en comparación con el grupo de endoprótesis (7,1% versus 4,4%, P = 0,001). No se observaron diferencias significativas en la fuga anastomótica entre los dos grupos (3,8% versus 2,6%, P = 0,06). La proporción de pacientes que precisaron estomas fue mayor con la colectomía urgente en comparación con aquellos tratados inicialmente con endoprótesis (5,1% versus 1,7%, P < 0,001). La estancia postoperatoria fue más larga después de la colectomía urgente que tras la colocación de una endoprótesis (15 días versus 13 días, P < 0,001) CONCLUSIÓN: En pacientes con obstrucción maligna del colon derecho, la colocación de una endoprótesis seguida de colectomía puede proporcionar resultados perioperatorios más favorables en comparación con la colectomía urgente.

Increased number of eosinophils in ascites is associated with intestinal anisakidosis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between eosinophils in ascites and the diagnosis of intestinal anisakidosis in patients with peritoneal signs on physical examination. We reviewed retrospectively 16 patients diagnosed with intestinal anisakidosis, evaluated between 2012 and 2015. All patients had ingested raw anchovies. The analysis of ascites fluid in ten of these patients was compared with that of 15 patients with ascites and other abdominal pathology (except liver cirrhosis). All patients had an increased number of white blood cells in the ascites fluid. The eosinophil count was significantly higher in patients with intestinal anisakidosis (P < 0.01). All patients had a good outcome. Increased eosinophils in ascites fluid is strongly associated with the diagnosis of intestinal anisakidosis.

Epidural analgesia is infrequently used in patients with acute pancreatitis : a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Epidural analgesia is an option for pain control in patients with acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study is to describe characteristics, morbidity and mortality of patients with acute pancreatitis treated with epidural analgesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data was extracted from a national inpatient database in Japan on patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis between July 2010 and March 2013. A total of 44,146 patients discharged from acute care hospitals were included in this retrospective cohort study. The patient background, timing and duration of epidural analgesia, complications (epidural hematoma or abscess), surgery (for cholelithiasis / cholecystitis or complications) and mortality were verified. RESULTS: Epidural analgesia was used in 307 patients (0.70 %). The mean age was 64.0 years (standard deviation, 15.4 years) and 116 (37.8%) of the patients were female. The median duration of epidural analgesia was four days (interquartile range, 3-5 days). No patient underwent surgery for epidural hematoma or abscess. Six (2.0%) patients died during hospitalization. Most likely causes of death were pulmonary embolism, multiple organ failure, sepsis, and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus enterocolitis. The responsible physician for 250 of the patients (81.4%) was a gastroenterological surgeon. Epidural analgesia was started on the day of surgery in 278 (90.6%) patients. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia is rarely used in patients with acute pancreatitis. None of the patients included in the study required surgery for epidural hematoma or abscess. Further research to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in patients with acute pancreatitis is warranted.

Living-Donor Liver Transplantation Using Segment 2 Monosegment Graft: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: In small infants, left lateral segment grafts are sometimes too large to overcome the problems of large-for-size grafts in the abdominal compartment. To address this problem, we have developed a safe living donor graftectomy for neonates, a so-called "S2 monosegment graft" to minimize graft thickness. We reviewed our single-center experience to evaluate the feasibility of this technique for reducing graft size. METHODS: Eleven living-donor liver transplants using S2 monosegment grafts were performed between October 2008 and September 2014 at our institution. Medical records of both donors and recipients were reviewed and data collected retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age of recipients at the time of transplantation was 125.3 days, including 3 neonates. The average S2 monosegment graft weight was 127.4 g, and the graft-to-recipient body weight ratio was successfully reduced to 3.5%. The graft livers were reduced to 4.1 cm in thickness. Two recipients with grafts larger than 5 cm could not undergo primary abdominal closure. Portal vein stenosis and biliary stenosis was observed in 1 recipient, and hepatic artery complications were seen in 2 recipients; the clinical course for all donors were uneventful. Liver regeneration was seen in every patient. The graft and patient 1-year survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Living-donor liver transplantation using S2 monosegment grafts offers a safe and useful option for treating smaller infants. Here, we introduce our method of S2 monosegment graft emphasizing the donor harvest and graft thickness.

Prolonged propofol infusion for mechanically ventilated children.

We retrospectively analysed 30-day mortality and duration of intubation for 8016 children ventilated for three or more days, sedated with midazolam (n = 7716) or propofol (n = 300). We matched the propensity scores of 263 pairs of children. The propensity-matched 30-day mortality (95% CI) was similar: 17/263 (6.5%) with midazolam vs. 24/263 (9.1%) with propofol, p = 0.26. Weaning from mechanical ventilation of children sedated with midazolam was slower than weaning of children sedated with propofol, subhazard ratio (95% CI) 1.43 (1.18-1.73), p < 0.001.